Home Jan. 6 committee seeks data from tech giants relating to assault on Capitol
The California regulation is without doubt one of the most vital coverage efforts up to now from Democrats and civil rights teams, who’re reacting to criticism that tech corporations aren’t doing sufficient to forestall abuse on their platforms. Newsom’s signature indicators that states might play a extra vital position in regulating the tech trade, passing payments addressing content material moderation and privateness following inaction in Congress.
“California will not stand by as social media is weaponized to spread hate and disinformation that threaten our communities and foundational values as a country,” Newsom mentioned in a information launch.
But main tech corporations and the commerce teams that signify them may convey authorized challenges in opposition to the California regulation. They’ve sued to dam different social media legal guidelines in conservative states reminiscent of Florida and Texas that may regulate how social media corporations police content material, in response to allegations that tech corporations are silencing conservative viewpoints.
Earlier this yr, tech trade commerce teams took their battle to the Supreme Court docket, which quickly blocked the Texas regulation.
Texas, 12 states fireplace again at tech trade in Supreme Court docket filings
Although the California regulation goals to deal with very totally different issues about social media corporations, the trade and a few authorized specialists have raised comparable First Modification issues concerning the laws.
Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara College Faculty of Regulation, wrote in a latest weblog put up that A.B. 587 “has censorial consequences.”
“The bill is likely to be struck down as unconstitutional at substantial taxpayer expense,” he wrote.