After a whole lot of interviews, 9 hearings and practically 18 months of labor, the Home committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the Capitol held its ultimate listening to Monday forward of the discharge of a report detailing its findings.
“I believe, nearly two years later, this is still a time of reflection and reckoning,” stated Chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.). “If we are to survive as a nation of laws and democracy, this can never happen again.”
Thompson stated that whereas the report — which the committee voted to undertake on Monday — will make various coverage suggestions to stop one other Jan. 6, guaranteeing future assaults don’t occur would require “accountability” by means of the prison justice system. The committee voted to advocate prison prices in opposition to former President Trump, lawyer John Eastman and others.
“We have every confidence that the work of this committee will help provide a road map to justice,” he stated.
After opening statements from Thompson and Vice Chair Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.), the committee performed a brief video laying out the important thing findings from previous hearings: Trump knew that he misplaced the 2020 election whilst he tried to overturn the outcomes by pressuring state officers, election employees, the Division of Justice and then-Vice President Mike Pence; Trump urged the mob to go to the Capitol; and he waited 187 minutes to launch a video asking his supporters to depart.
Listed here are the important thing factors the committee made throughout its ultimate listening to.
A number of prison referrals
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) stated that the panel’s subcommittee tasked with trying into prison referrals would advocate prison prices in opposition to Trump and Eastman.
The subcommittee proposed recommending the Division of Justice cost Trump, Eastman and others with obstruction of an official continuing and conspiracy to defraud america. Raskin stated the committee can be recommending that the Justice Division cost Trump with conspiracy to make a false assertion and efforts to “incite” or “assist” in an rebel.
“We propose to the committee advancing referrals where the gravity of the specific offense, the severity of its actual harm and the centrality of the offender to the overall design of the unlawful scheme to overthrow the election compel us to speak,” Raskin stated. “Ours is not a system of justice where the foot soldiers go to jail and the masterminds and ringleaders get a free pass.”
New issues over witness tampering
Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose) stated that Trump used cash raised from supporters to rent attorneys and “provide or offer employment to witnesses.”
Lofgren stated one witness was advised by a lawyer that she might inform the committee she couldn’t recall occasions that she did, in truth, keep in mind. In keeping with Lofgren, the witness stated that lawyer declined to state who was paying for his illustration. One other witness stated she was approached with a profitable potential employment alternative forward of her testimony by entities tied to Trump, however the job didn’t pan out.
“These offers were withdrawn or didn’t materialize as reports of the content of her testimony circulated,” Lofgren stated. “The witness believed this was an effort to affect her testimony and we are concerned that these efforts may have been a strategy to prevent the committee from learning the truth.”
New testimony from Hope Hicks
A number of witnesses, together with former Atty. Gen. William Barr, have testified that they advised Trump there was no proof of widespread election fraud that may have modified the result of the election. Monday’s listening to featured video testimony from a brand new witness, former White Home communications director Hope Hicks.
“I was becoming increasingly concerned that we were damaging his legacy,” Hicks advised the committee of the previous president.
In response, Hicks stated Trump replied with “something along the lines of ‘Nobody will care about my legacy if I lose … the only thing that matters is winning.’”