‘Gilmore Girls’ Star Scott Patterson Felt Like ‘Meat Stick’ In ‘Most Disturbing’ Scene

The place “Gilmore Girls” leads, actor Scott Patterson follows episode by episode on his rewatch podcast, bringing you into the thoughts of the one that performed Stars Hole’s most closely flanneled resident.

However revisiting even essentially the most beloved early-aughts present is an unavoidably cringe journey, which Patterson, who starred within the WB collection as diner proprietor Luke Danes, confronted whereas watching a scene within the Season 3 episode titled “Keg! Max.”

The actor stated he was “shocked” by an change between Lorelai (Lauren Graham) and Sookie (Melissa McCarthy), wherein they admire his butt after the latter by accident rests her hand on his bottom. And, in typical Gilmore vogue, Lorelai totally commits to the bit, continuing to say her future husband’s behind a number of instances all through the scene.

“That was disturbing. I realized it wasn’t OK, and it didn’t make me feel comfortable at all. It made me feel really embarrassed, actually,” Patterson stated on a latest episode of his “I Am All In” podcast. “It is infuriating to be treated that way — it is infuriating — because you’re being treated like an object. It’s disturbing, and it’s disgusting. And I had to endure that through that entire scene and many takes.”

“It was all about the butt, the butt, the butt, the butt. When we weren’t filming, we were sitting down — people were still talking about the butt, the butt, the butt,” he continued. “It was the most disturbing time I have ever spent on that set, and I couldn’t wait for that day to be over.”

Lauren Graham and Scott Patterson in Netflix’s “Gilmore Girls: A Day in the Life.”

Patterson stated the expertise left him with a “level of shame” as a result of he by no means shared his emotions with creator Amy Sherman-Palladino. He went on to explain the behind-the-scenes atmosphere on the collection as significantly “rigid,” with actors not allowed to “diverge from the script, ever.”

“Just because it was 2003 didn’t mean it was OK,” he stated. “It’s never OK. And I didn’t feel comfortable doing it and it pissed me off. I never said anything, so I was angry at myself for never saying anything. But, you know, I had this job and I didn’t want to make waves and all that.”

“It’s as disgusting for women to objectify men as it for men to objectify women and it’s as harmful,” Patterson added.

Whereas Patterson reiterated that the collection, which acquired a four-episode revival on Netflix in 2016, was a “great job and means the world to me,” the scene in query left him feeling “incredibly small” and like “some kind of meat stick.”

He additionally feared that the portrayal might need implications for his profession and the form of roles he could be supplied. “What are Academy members gonna say when they see this scene?” he stated he puzzled.

“I mean, really, what am I involved in here? It really questioned why I was doing the show at the time,” he added. “Somebody had to pay the price for that. And I’m still paying the price for it. ”

Sherman-Palladino has but to answer Patterson’s feedback.

The creator has, nonetheless, teased a attainable follow-up to the revival within the years since, ought to scheduling points and her present collection “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel” enable it sooner or later.

“I really do believe that if the time is right and the girls are where they need to be in their lives,” it may occur,” Sherman-Palladino stated in 2020, per TVLine. “They all have things … But if that [kismet] moment presents itself again [we’d do it] in a hot second.”